Blockchain Data Oracles

Oracles were individuals who were believed to be able to communicate with the gods and provide prophecies and guidance to people. In many ancient cultures, oracles were an important part of religious and spiritual life, and people would seek out oracles to receive guidance on important matters such as wars, crop yields, and natural disasters.

Blockchain oracles are very similar in that sense - they also communicate with external entities to information about important matter, however not as grand as war guidance.

So, what are blockchain oracles?

Simply put these are third-party services that provide real-world data to smart contracts on the blockchain. This data can be used to trigger the execution of the smart contract, or it can be used as an input to the contract.

Blockchain oracles are most commonly used to provide smart contracts with access to external data. This data can be used in a variety of different ways, depending on the specific use case. Some examples of how oracles can be used include:

  • Providing real-time market data to a smart contract that is used to execute a financial transaction, such as the exchange of one cryptocurrency for another
  • Providing weather data to a smart contract that is used to trigger the execution of an insurance contract based on certain weather conditions
  • Providing supply chain data to a smart contract that is used to verify the authenticity of a product or to track the movement of goods through the supply chain
  • Providing data from Internet of Things (IoT) devices to a smart contract that is used to automate certain processes or to make decisions based on sensor readings

In general, the best use cases for blockchain oracles are those that require access to real-world data that is outside of the blockchain. By using an oracle, it is possible to connect the blockchain to the physical world in a way that is secure and transparent. This can be particularly useful for applications that involve complex supply chain management, financial transactions, or other situations where access to real-time data is important.

The main advantage of using oracles is that they can provide smart contracts with access to external data, which can be useful in a variety of different applications. For example, a smart contract could use an oracle to check the current weather in a certain location before executing a contract.

One of the main disadvantages of using oracles is that they can be a potential point of failure in a smart contract system. Because oracles are external to the blockchain, they are not subject to the same level of security and immutability as the blockchain itself. This means that if an oracle is compromised or goes offline, it could cause problems for the smart contracts that rely on it. Additionally, because oracles are typically operated by third parties, there may be concerns about trust and reliability.

Types of blockchain oracles

Blockchain oracles work by providing smart contracts with access to external data. This data can be used to trigger the execution of the contract, or it can be used as an input to the contract. In order to do this, oracles typically use one of two technologies: off-chain or on-chain.

Off-chain oracles are third-party services that provide data to smart contracts. These oracles are not part of the blockchain itself, but they can communicate with the blockchain in order to provide data to smart contracts. Off-chain oracles are typically faster and more flexible than on-chain oracles, but they are also more centralized and may be less secure.

On-chain oracles, on the other hand, are part of the blockchain itself. This means that they are able to access data on the blockchain and use it to trigger the execution of smart contracts. On-chain oracles are more decentralized and secure than off-chain oracles, but they are also slower and less flexible.

There are several different types of oracles that exist, including:

  • Software oracles, which are programs that provide data to smart contracts
  • Hardware oracles, which are physical devices that provide data to smart contracts
  • Inbound oracles, which provide data to smart contracts from external sources
  • Outbound oracles, which provide data from the blockchain to external systems
  • Reputation oracles, which provide data about the reputation of a particular entity on the blockchain
  • Hybrid oracles, which combine elements of different types of oracles in order to provide a more comprehensive solution.

Another type of oracles are or verifieble randon function, or VRF. A VRF blockchain oracle is a type of oracle that uses a verifiable random function (VRF) to provide data to a smart contract. A VRF is a cryptographic function that can be used to generate random numbers in a way that is verifiable and unpredictable. This makes it useful for applications where a random number is needed, such as in a lottery or in a game of chance.

To use a VRF blockchain oracle, the oracle first generates a random number using the VRF. This number is then passed to the smart contract, which can use it as an input or use it to trigger the execution of the contract. Because the VRF is verifiable and unpredictable, it is difficult for anyone to predict or manipulate the random number that is generated.

Overall

One way that a VRF blockchain oracle could be hacked is if the VRF itself is compromised. If an attacker is able to find a way to predict the output of the VRF, they could potentially manipulate the random number that is generated. Additionally, if the oracle itself is compromised, an attacker could potentially manipulate the data that is provided to the smart contract. To prevent these types of attacks, it is important for VRF blockchain oracles to use strong cryptographic techniques and to be carefully designed and implemented.

Blockchain oracles can bring more innovation and new use cases into the blockchain ecosystem by providing smart contracts with access to external data. This external data can be used in a variety of different ways to create new and innovative applications on the blockchain.

For example, blockchain oracles could be used to connect the blockchain to the Internet of Things (IoT), allowing smart contracts to be triggered by events or data from physical devices. This could enable new applications in areas such as supply chain management, building automation, and predictive maintenance.

Additionally, blockchain oracles could be used to connect the blockchain to traditional financial systems, allowing for the creation of new financial products and services on the blockchain. This could enable the development of new types of financial instruments, such as derivatives and other complex financial products, as well as new types of payment systems and financial services.

Overall, by providing smart contracts with access to external data, blockchain oracles can enable a wide range of new and innovative use cases on the blockchain, opening up new possibilities for the development of decentralized applications and services.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

CAP Theorem and blockchain

Image
In theoretical computer science, the CAP theorem states that it is impossible for a distributed data store (such as a blockchain network) to simultaneously provide more than two out of the three guarantees: Consistency, Availability & Partition tolerance. CAP Theorem – the parts C: Consistency – At any given time, all nodes in the network have exactly the same (most recent) value. A: Availability – Every request to the network receives a response, though without any guarantee that returned data is the most recent. P: Partition tolerance – The network continues to operate, even if an arbitrary number of nodes are failing. Due to the nature of distributed data stores (such as blockchain), Partition tolerance is a given fact; there will always be failing/unreachable nodes in the network (not least because of the unstable nature of the internet). CAP Theorem states that one has to choose between C (Consistency) or A (Availability) when in the presence of P (Partition): Av...
Read more

Length extension attack

Image
What is length extension? When a Merkle–Damgård based hash is misused as a message authentication code with construction H(secret ‖ message), and message and the length of secret is known, a length extension attack allows anyone to include extra information at the end of the message and produce a valid hash without knowing the secret. Quick sidebar, before you freak out: Since HMAC does not use this construction, HMAC hashes are not prone to length extension attacks. So, a length extension attack is a type of attack where an attacker can use Hash(message1) and the length of message1 to calculate Hash(message1 ‖ message2) for an attacker-controlled message2, without needing to know the content of message1. Algorithms like MD5, SHA-1 and most of SHA-2 that are based on the Merkle–Damgård construction are susceptible to this kind of attack. Truncated versions of SHA-2, including SHA-384 and SHA-512/256 are not susceptible, nor is the SHA-3 algorithm. A bit more details ...
Read more

Contract upgrade anti-patterns

Image
A popular trend in smart contract design is to promote the development of upgradable contracts . To be fair, existing techniques to upgrade contracts have flaws, increase the complexity of the contract significantly, and ultimately introduce bugs - even in the Zeppelin contract upgrade strategy. In this article, we are going to detail our analysis of existing smart contract upgrade strategies, describe the weaknesses we have observed in practice, and provide recommendations for contracts that require upgrades. In a follow-up blog post, we will detail a method, contract migration, that achieves the same benefits with few of the downsides. An overview of upgradable contracts Two ‘families’ of patterns have emerged for upgradable smart contracts: Data separation, where logic and data are kept in separate contracts. The logic contract owns and calls the data contract. Delegatecall-based proxies, where logic and data are kept in separate contracts, also, but the data contr...
Read more